Teachers Step up Software and Check list
Employees StepUp Software Increment Preparation Bill, Steup Conditions as per G.O. Ms. No. 93 Finance ( PC- II) Department , Dated:03-04-2010
(i) both the Senior and Junior should have been drawing pay in an identical scale
(ii) both the Senior and Junior should be in service as on 01-07-2008 and junior should have been promoted on or after 01-07-2008. In other words the anomaly should have arisen on or after 1-7-2008.
(iii) the senior as well as the junior should be promoted to the same category of post carrying the same scale of pay under the same mode of recruitment and from the same unit of appointment in the lower category.
iv) the pay of the junior in the lower category should have been less than or equal to that of the senior in the lower category prior to promotion of the senior to the higher post.
(v) the anomaly should be directly as a result in the case of Junior, who is promoted to a higher post after getting the benefit of Automatic Advancement Scheme and got more pay than his senior in the same category, who got promotion to the higher post without getting the benefit of Automatic Advancement Scheme.
(vi) the pay of the senior should have been fixed under F.R. 22(a)(i) read with F.R. 31(2) on promotion from Automatic Advancement Scales in the feeder category, whereas the pay of the Junior should have been fixed under F.R. 22-B on promotion from the Automatic Advancement Scales in the feeder category.
(vii) the stepping up pay is not admissible in cases where the junior is drawing higher pay for any other reason such as sanction of Advance Increment for possession of higher qualification or Family Planning Incentive Increment or reckoning D.A. thereon for fixation of pay in earlier pay revisions, Advance Increments for merit, or on account of longer service in the lower post for working in various units of appointments etc.
(viii) in all cases affected by this order, the pay of the senior shall be fixed notionally from the date the junior got higher pay than that of the senior in the higher post, with monetary benefit from 01-02-2010, if such anomaly arose in between 01-07-2008 to 31-01-2010. In cases where such anomaly arose after 01-02-2010, the benefit shall be allowed from the date the pay of the Junior was more than that of Senior
|S.No.||DETAILS OF EMPLOYEE||SENIOR||JUNIOR|
|1||Name of the Employee||Sri. S.Kumar||Sri. B.Anji Babu|
|2||Feeder Post Designation||S.G.T.||S.G.T.|
|3||Promotion Post Designation||S.A.(B.S.)||S.A.(B.S.)|
|4||Date of Appointment to the Feeder Post||12/11/2000||12/11/2000|
|5||D.Sc. of Appointment of the Feeder Post/ Roster No.||D.Sc. 2000 / 458||D.Sc. 2000 / 596|
|6||Special Grade( SG)
|7||SPP – IA 12 years||23/08/2012||12/11/2012|
|8||SPP -IB 18years||———||12/07/2014|
|9||Pay in the lower cadre as on date of promotion of senior||20050||20050|
|10||Date of Promotion||17/08/2012||20/11/2013|
|11||Pay fixed on Promotion ( FR 22 a)||20640||20050|
|12||Pay fixed on Promotion ( FR 22 b)||……………….||22460|
|13||Scale of Pay in feeder post on date of promotion||21230-63010||28940-78910|
|14||Scale of Pay ( Present )||22460-66330||29760-80930|
|15||Date of Increment||Nov-13||Nov-13|
|16||Present Basic Pay||21820||22460|
|17||Pay fixed on
Stepping up of Pay w.e.f. 01/11/2013
|CONDITIONS||FULLFILLED OR NOT|
|1||Both the senoir and junior should
have been drawing pay in an identical pay scale in the existing scales of pay
|2||The senior as well as the junior
should be promoted to the same category of post carrying the same scale of
pay under the same mode of recruitment and from the same unit of appointment
in the lower category
|3||the pay of the junior in the lower category should have
been less than or equal to that of the senior in the lower category prior to
promotion of the senior to the higher post
|4||the anomoly should have arisen
directly as a result of the fixation of pay in the existing scales under AAS
Signature of the Mandal Education Officer